Re: IPSEC Offload

2006-01-17 Thread Dave Dillow
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 15:01 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Dave Dillow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:25:57 -0500 > > > In that case, I'll blow the dust off and try to make it sooner > > rather than later. > > Please take your time with it. 2.6.16 feature window has close

Re: IPSEC Offload

2006-01-17 Thread David S. Miller
From: Dave Dillow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:25:57 -0500 > In that case, I'll blow the dust off and try to make it sooner > rather than later. Please take your time with it. 2.6.16 feature window has closed and 2.6.17 is at least a month or two away. - To unsubscribe from this

Re: IPSEC Offload

2006-01-17 Thread Dave Dillow
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 13:16 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Dave Dillow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:45:04 -0500 > > > Would this still be interesting to anyone? If I can get a good > > framework in place, maybe we can get Intel to open up their cards to > > work with it a

Re: IPSEC Offload

2006-01-17 Thread David S. Miller
From: Dave Dillow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:45:04 -0500 > Would this still be interesting to anyone? If I can get a good > framework in place, maybe we can get Intel to open up their cards to > work with it as well. I feel like support for this is inevitable, personally. It's