Re: Bluetooth fixes for 2.6.20-rc4

2007-01-07 Thread David Miller
From: Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:44:41 +0100 > it is way too late and you are absolutely right. However since the > current code doesn't produce a compiler warning of an uninitialized > variable, I prefer to not go with a "int err = 0" to make this work. > > I r

Re: Bluetooth fixes for 2.6.20-rc4

2007-01-07 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Dave, > > > > Commit: 2b2e64be763c5e64d4ae4a061825b18decf1edf7 > > > > Author: Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:00:33 > > > > +0100 > > > > > > > > [Bluetooth] Fix uninitialized return value for RFCOMM sendmsg() > > > > > > > > When calling send() with a

Re: Bluetooth fixes for 2.6.20-rc4

2007-01-07 Thread David Miller
From: Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:19:13 +0100 > Hi Dave, > > > > Commit: 2b2e64be763c5e64d4ae4a061825b18decf1edf7 > > > Author: Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:00:33 > > > +0100 > > > > > > [Bluetooth] Fix uninitialized return valu

Re: Bluetooth fixes for 2.6.20-rc4

2007-01-07 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Dave, > > Commit: 2b2e64be763c5e64d4ae4a061825b18decf1edf7 > > Author: Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:00:33 +0100 > > > > [Bluetooth] Fix uninitialized return value for RFCOMM sendmsg() > > > > When calling send() with a zero length parameter on a RFCOMM

Re: Bluetooth fixes for 2.6.20-rc4

2007-01-07 Thread David Miller
From: Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:31:44 +0100 > Commit: 2b2e64be763c5e64d4ae4a061825b18decf1edf7 > Author: Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:00:33 +0100 > > [Bluetooth] Fix uninitialized return value for RFCOMM sendmsg() > > W