On 7/4/07, Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:40:48 +0200
"Robert Iakobashvili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/4/07, Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:50:31AM +0200, Robert Iakobashvili ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > If I
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:40:48 +0200
"Robert Iakobashvili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/4/07, Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:50:31AM +0200, Robert Iakobashvili ([EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > If I am correct, a TCP server can make up to
> > > 64K
On 7/4/07, Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:50:31AM +0200, Robert Iakobashvili ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If I am correct, a TCP server can make up to
> 64K accepts for a port at a single IP-address.
No, it is essentially unlimited - linux uses local/remo
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:50:31AM +0200, Robert Iakobashvili ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If I am correct, a TCP server can make up to
> 64K accepts for a port at a single IP-address.
No, it is essentially unlimited - linux uses local/remote addr/port
tuples for hash chains, so there is no per-a
* Robert Iakobashvili:
> If I am correct, a TCP server can make up to
> 64K accepts for a port at a single IP-address.
I don't think such a limit exists. In typical configurations, a
single client IP address can only establish a few tens of thousands of
TCP connections to one server port. But a
