Re: Badness at net/core/dev.c:2199

2007-12-20 Thread Meelis Roos
> I already sendout a correct patch last week. It should pre-increment. Any hope getting it upstream? -- Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.cs.ut.ee/~mroos/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majord

Re: Badness at net/core/dev.c:2199

2007-12-16 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:33:40AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > index 3653314..9e0e97a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/tulip/interrupt.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/tulip/interrupt.c > > @@ -151,8 +151,9 @@ int tulip_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) > >

Re: Badness at net/core/dev.c:2199

2007-12-16 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:20:57 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:55:55PM +0200, Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > Just got this trace from current 2.6.24-rc5+git running on 32-bit ppc > > (PReP subarch, tulip NIC's) during apt-get update (log

Re: Badness at net/core/dev.c:2199

2007-12-16 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:55:55PM +0200, Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Just got this trace from current 2.6.24-rc5+git running on 32-bit ppc > (PReP subarch, tulip NIC's) during apt-get update (logged in via ssh so > also ssh traffic): > > [ cut here ] > Badne