Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 - BUG in tcp_fragment

2007-12-13 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote: > >> I got this one while compiling on NFS. >> >> C. >> >> kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/net/tcp.h:1480! > > I'm not exactly sure what patches you have applied and which patches are > not, with rc4-mm

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 - BUG in tcp_fragment

2007-12-13 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote: > I got this one while compiling on NFS. > > C. > > kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/include/net/tcp.h:1480! I'm not exactly sure what patches you have applied and which patches are not, with rc4-mm1 there are two patches (first one

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 - BUG in tcp_fragment

2007-12-13 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Andrew Morton wrote: > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ I got this one while compiling on NFS. C. kernel BUG at /home/legoater/linux/2

tcp_sacktag_one() WARNING (was Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1)

2007-12-13 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Cedric Le Goater wrote: > Ilpo Järvinen wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change then - certainly look

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-12 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change >>> then >>> - certainly looks networking related. >> yep, but it

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-12 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 >> >>> On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over to e1000e

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 21:17:01 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Changes since 2.6.24-rc3-mm2: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 brought a nice TCP oops on my x86_64 system, while I was stress-testing the VM and watching via ssh: general protection fault: [1] SMP last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:17:16 -0800 Kok, Auke wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800 > > "Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > - Lots

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Kok, Auke
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800 > "Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved > over

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800 "Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> > >>> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved > >>> over > >>> to e1000e. So

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Kok, Auke
Kok, Auke wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set CONFIG_E1000E. >>

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Kok, Auke
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> >>> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved >>> over >>> to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set >>> CONFIG_E1000E. >>> >>> >> Wouldn't it

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can't see this compile failure posted anywhere: > > http://test.kernel.org/results/IBM/126049/build/debug/stderr > > > > arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: Assembler messages: > > arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S:23: Error: suffix or operands inval

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved > > over > > to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set > > CONFIG_E1000E. > > > > > Wouldn't it make sense to just de

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-11 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 11/12/2007 8:11 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:48:39 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/ker

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:48:39 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-10 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > Dave, please include this one to net-2.6.25. ... > -- > [PATCH] [TCP]: Fix fack_count miscountings (multiple places) I've better version of this coming up, so Dave please don't put this one into net-2.6.25 (noticed that both the original and the afte

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-10 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This non fatal oops which I have just noticed may be related to this change > > then > > - certainly looks networking related. > > yep, but it isn't e1000. It's core

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-07 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote: > From: Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 > > > On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved > > > over > > > to e1000e. So if your e100

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/p

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-05 Thread David Miller
From: Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:37 +1100 > On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved over > > to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set > > CONFIG_E1000E. > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1

2007-12-05 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 5/12/2007 4:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/ - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved