Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla

2005-12-22 Thread David S. Miller
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 00:52:09 -0800 > From: Charles-Edouard Ruault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [BUG] kernel 2.6.14.2 breaks IPSEC Herbert's reply at the end of the thread explains that what the user is doing, applying SNAT to IPSEC, has undefined resul

Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla

2005-12-22 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:15:57 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:13:20AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > The following bug in the kernel Bugzilla contains a regressions in > > 2.6.15-rc without a patch: > > - #5760 No sound with snd_intel8x0 & ALi M5455 chipset > > (kobject

Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla

2005-12-22 Thread Andrew Morton
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The following bugs in the kernel Bugzilla [1] contain regressions in > 2.6.15-rc compared to 2.6.14 with patches: Thanks for tracking this. Although I fear it won't come to much. non-bugzilla post-2.6.14 bugs which I've squirelled away include: From:

Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla

2005-12-21 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:13:20AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The following bug in the kernel Bugzilla contains a regressions in > 2.6.15-rc without a patch: > - #5760 No sound with snd_intel8x0 & ALi M5455 chipset > (kobject_register failed) We put code in the kobjet to report when call