From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 21:58:35 +0100
> Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:43:45PM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>>From: David Miller
>>Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:28:48 -0500 (EST)
>>
>>> Looks really nice, series applied, thanks!
>>
>>Jiri, just FYI, I bungled up merging this. And I am t
From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:16:27 +0100
> From: Jiri Pirko
>
> Ido says:
>
> When the kernel forwards IPv4 packets via multipath routes it doesn't
> consider nexthops that are dead or linkdown. For example, if the nexthop
> netdev is administratively down or doesn't have a carri
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 03:43:45PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:28:48 -0500 (EST)
>
> > Looks really nice, series applied, thanks!
>
> Jiri, just FYI, I bungled up merging this. And I am trying to fix
> that up.
>
> I forgot to include patch #14,
Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:43:45PM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: David Miller
>Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:28:48 -0500 (EST)
>
>> Looks really nice, series applied, thanks!
>
>Jiri, just FYI, I bungled up merging this. And I am trying to fix
>that up.
>
>I forgot to include patch #14, but I'l
From: David Miller
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:28:48 -0500 (EST)
> Looks really nice, series applied, thanks!
Jiri, just FYI, I bungled up merging this. And I am trying to fix
that up.
I forgot to include patch #14, but I'll apply that now in the
mainline.
I get a warning, in mlxsw_sp_nexthop_g
