Hi David,
David Miller writes:
> I'm fine with this patch set. I see it's against Jeff's next-queue, so
> where exactly do you want this to be merged? My net-next tree?
I think it going through Jeff's next-queue makes more sense.
Anyway, I will send a v9 later today fixing the padding issue
+Jeff
Since this patchset also touches the IGB driver, Jeff suggested we merged it
into his tree and he'd make a pull-request to your net-next tree.
@Jeff, are we moving with this approach or should David apply the patchset to
his net-next tree directly?
Thanks,
Andre
On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 20:
I'm fine with this patch set. I see it's against Jeff's next-queue, so
where exactly do you want this to be merged? My net-next tree?
Thank you.
