On Wed, 2007-16-05 at 23:25 -0400, jamal wrote:
>
> This patch now includes two changed drivers (tun and e1000). I have
> tested tun with this patch. I tested e1000 earlier and i couldnt find
> any issues - although as the tittle says its a WIP.
>
> As before you need net-2.6. You also need the
Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/17/2007 03:14:41 AM:
> Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> > Hi Sridhar,
> >
> > Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/17/2007 03:42:03 AM:
> >
> >> AFAIK, gso_skb can be a list of skb's. Can we add a list
> >> to another list using __skb_queue_hea
Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Hi Sridhar,
Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/17/2007 03:42:03 AM:
AFAIK, gso_skb can be a list of skb's. Can we add a list
to another list using __skb_queue_head()?
Also, if gso_skb is a list of multiple skb's, i think the
count needs to be decremented by
Hi Sridhar,
Sridhar Samudrala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/17/2007 03:42:03 AM:
> AFAIK, gso_skb can be a list of skb's. Can we add a list
> to another list using __skb_queue_head()?
> Also, if gso_skb is a list of multiple skb's, i think the
> count needs to be decremented by the number of se
On Wed, 2007-16-05 at 18:52 -0400, jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-16-05 at 15:12 -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>
> I will have to think a bit about this; i may end up coalescing when
> grabbing the packets but call the nit from the driver using a helper.
>
Thats what i did. This would hopefully
On Wed, 2007-16-05 at 15:12 -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> Jamal,
>
> Here are some comments i have on your patch.
> See them inline.
>
Thanks for taking the time Sridhar.
> try_tx_pkts() is directly calling the device's batch xmit routine.
> Don't we need to call dev_hard_start_xmit() to ha
Jamal,
Here are some comments i have on your patch.
See them inline.
Thanks
Sridhar
+static int try_get_tx_pkts(struct net_device *dev, struct Qdisc *q, int count)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ struct sk_buff_head *skbs = &dev->blist;
+ int tdq = count;
+
+ /*
+* v
On Tue, 2007-15-05 at 18:48 -0400, jamal wrote:
> I will try to post the e1000 patch tonight or tommorow morning.
I have the e1000 path done; a few features from the 2.6.18 missing
(mainly the one mucking with tx ring pruning on the tx path).
While it compiles and looks right - i havent tested it
On Tue, 2007-15-05 at 18:17 -0400, jamal wrote:
> I will post a patch for tun device in a few minutes
> that i use to test on my laptop (i need to remove some debugs) to show
> an example.
Ok, here it is.
The way i test is to point packets at a tun device. [One way i do it
is attach an ingress q
