Re: [RFC PATCH net] sctp: ASCONF-ACK with Unresolvable Address should be sent

2015-08-11 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Em 11-08-2015 01:34, lucien xin escreveu: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 01:08:08PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: RFC 5061: This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each request parameter. The receiver of the ASCO

Re: [RFC PATCH net] sctp: ASCONF-ACK with Unresolvable Address should be sent

2015-08-10 Thread lucien xin
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 01:08:08PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: >> RFC 5061: >> This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each >> request parameter. The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this >> 32-bit

Re: [RFC PATCH net] sctp: ASCONF-ACK with Unresolvable Address should be sent

2015-07-27 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 01:08:08PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > RFC 5061: > This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each > request parameter. The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this > 32-bit value into the ASCONF Response Correlation ID field of the > ASCON

Re: [RFC PATCH net] sctp: ASCONF-ACK with Unresolvable Address should be sent

2015-07-24 Thread lucien xin
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:56:29PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: >> RFC 5061: >> This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each >> request parameter. The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this >> 32-bit

Re: [RFC PATCH net] sctp: ASCONF-ACK with Unresolvable Address should be sent

2015-07-24 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:56:29PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > RFC 5061: > This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each > request parameter. The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this > 32-bit value into the ASCONF Response Correlation ID field of the > ASCON