On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:06:29PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 04/10/18 15:08, John W. Linville wrote:
> > Ping?
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:59:10PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> >> Is this patch still RFC?
> Feel free to de-RFC and apply it.
Great -- queued for next release.
John
--
On 04/10/18 15:08, John W. Linville wrote:
> Ping?
>
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:59:10PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>> Is this patch still RFC?
Feel free to de-RFC and apply it.
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:08:14AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> Ping?
>
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:59:10PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > Is this patch still RFC?
As far as I'm concerned, it can be taken as it is.
Michal Kubecek
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:06:25PM +0100, Edwar
Ping?
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:59:10PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> Is this patch still RFC?
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:06:25PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> > Instead of commas, just have them as separate argvs.
> >
> > The parsing state machine might look heavyweight, but it makes it e
Is this patch still RFC?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:06:25PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> Instead of commas, just have them as separate argvs.
>
> The parsing state machine might look heavyweight, but it makes it easy to add
> more parameters later and distinguish parameter names from encoding nam
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:06:25PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> Instead of commas, just have them as separate argvs.
>
> The parsing state machine might look heavyweight, but it makes it easy to add
> more parameters later and distinguish parameter names from encoding names.
>
> Suggested-by: Mic
