From: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:58:28 +0200
> On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 08:24 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
>
> > I think its best to use your patch for now and see where this leads to.
>
> Alright, should I repost with a proper [PATCH] subject or is it good to
> take a
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 08:24 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> I think its best to use your patch for now and see where this leads to.
Alright, should I repost with a proper [PATCH] subject or is it good to
take as-is? :)
johannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
t
* Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-09-14 11:21
> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:14 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
>
> > Looks good, we have to watch the size of struct nla_policy though.
> > This bumps the size from 4 bytes to 16 bytes on 64bit architectures
> > which might become a problem since we al
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:14 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> Looks good, we have to watch the size of struct nla_policy though.
> This bumps the size from 4 bytes to 16 bytes on 64bit architectures
> which might become a problem since we always use ATTR_MAX sized
> arrays.
Yes, I'm aware of that, but
* Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-09-14 09:44
> This patch adds an NLA_CUSTOM_CHECK type for netlink attributes
> in order to be able to centrally define new attribute structures
> instead of having to check these special types in each function
> that uses such an attribute.
>
> nl80211 wil
