On 3/19/21 6:53 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:54 PM David Ahern wrote:
>>
>> On 3/19/21 10:11 AM, Ishaan Gandhi wrote:
>>> Thank you. Would it be better to do instead:
>>>
>>> + if_index = skb->skb_iif;
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> + if_index = ip_version == 4 ? inet_iif(sk
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:54 PM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 3/19/21 10:11 AM, Ishaan Gandhi wrote:
> > Thank you. Would it be better to do instead:
> >
> > + if_index = skb->skb_iif;
> >
> > or
> >
> > + if_index = ip_version == 4 ? inet_iif(skb) : skb->skb_iif;
> >
>
> If the packet comes i
On 3/19/21 10:11 AM, Ishaan Gandhi wrote:
> Thank you. Would it be better to do instead:
>
> + if_index = skb->skb_iif;
>
> or
>
> + if_index = ip_version == 4 ? inet_iif(skb) : skb->skb_iif;
>
If the packet comes in via an interface assigned to a VRF, skb_iif is
most likely the VRF in
Thank you. Would it be better to do instead:
+ if_index = skb->skb_iif;
or
+ if_index = ip_version == 4 ? inet_iif(skb) : skb->skb_iif;
> On Mar 19, 2021, at 7:55 AM, David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 3/17/21 4:19 PM, ishaangandhi wrote:
>> +void icmp_identify_arrival_interface(struct sk_
On 3/17/21 4:19 PM, ishaangandhi wrote:
> +void icmp_identify_arrival_interface(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net,
> int room,
> + char *icmph, int ip_version)
> +{
> + unsigned int ext_len, orig_len, word_aligned_orig_len, offset,
> extra_space_needed,
> +
