Re: [PATCH v2] socket.7: Document some BPF-related socket options

2016-03-01 Thread Craig Gallek
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > On 03/01/2016 11:10 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: >> ❦ 1 mars 2016 11:03 +0100, "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" >> : >> >>> Once the SO_LOCK_FILTER option has been enabled, >>> attempts by an unprivilege

Re: [PATCH v2] socket.7: Document some BPF-related socket options

2016-03-01 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
On 03/01/2016 11:10 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 1 mars 2016 11:03 +0100, "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" > : > >> Once the SO_LOCK_FILTER option has been enabled, >> attempts by an unprivileged process to change or remove >> the filter attached to a

Re: [PATCH v2] socket.7: Document some BPF-related socket options

2016-03-01 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 1 mars 2016 11:03 +0100, "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)"  : > Once the SO_LOCK_FILTER option has been enabled, > attempts by an unprivileged process to change or remove > the filter attached to a socket, or to disable the > SO_LOCK_FILTER o

Re: [PATCH v2] socket.7: Document some BPF-related socket options

2016-03-01 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Craig, On 02/29/2016 06:36 PM, Craig Gallek wrote: > From: Craig Gallek Thanks for improvements. I've applied the patch and tweaked things somewhat, but I have a few comments and queries below. I'd be grateful if you'd check these, in case I have introduced any errors. (The tweaked version