From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:48:12 +0100
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:42:55PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote:
>> Hi Pablo,
>>
>> This is a resent of last series that missed the merge window. There
>> are no changes compared to v4.
>>
>> v4: Compared to v3 it contains mostly s
Hi Pablo,
- On Mar 13, 2017, at 5:48 PM, pablo pa...@netfilter.org wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:42:55PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote:
>> Hi Pablo,
>>
>> This is a resent of last series that missed the merge window. There
>> are no changes compared to v4.
>>
>> v4: Compared to v3 it c
Hi Pablo,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:48:12PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> I would like you take the time to develop the VRF idea that you want
> to introduce, I just would like that we avoid bloating the GTP tunnel
> with features that we can just achieve via composite of different
> subsyste
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:42:55PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> This is a resent of last series that missed the merge window. There
> are no changes compared to v4.
>
> v4: Compared to v3 it contains mostly smallish naming and spelling fixes.
> It also drops the documentation pat
Hi Andreas,
> Andreas Schultz (7):
> gtp: switch from struct socket to struct sock for the GTP sockets
> gtp: make GTP sockets in gtp_newlink optional
> gtp: merge gtp_get_net and gtp_genl_find_dev
> gtp: consolidate gtp socket rx path
> gtp: unify genl_find_pdp and prepare for per socke
