On 8/22/2019 6:57 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Blakey
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:30:51 +0300
>
>> @@ -4050,6 +4060,9 @@ enum skb_ext_id {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>> SKB_EXT_SEC_PATH,
>> #endif
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_TC_SKB_EXT)
>> +TC_SKB_EXT,
>> +#endif
>> SKB_EXT
From: Paul Blakey
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:30:51 +0300
> @@ -4050,6 +4060,9 @@ enum skb_ext_id {
> #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> SKB_EXT_SEC_PATH,
> #endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_TC_SKB_EXT)
> + TC_SKB_EXT,
> +#endif
> SKB_EXT_NUM, /* must be last */
> };
Sorry, no.
The SKB ext
Hey guys, sorry for spam, I used the --in-reply-to this time so it gets
to the original thread ("[PATCH net-next v2] net: openvswitch: Set OvS
recirc_id from tc chain index") ,
Ignore this thread and respond there if needed.
Thanks.
On 8/20/2019 3:40 PM, Paul Blakey wrote:
> Regarding the us
Regarding the user_features change, I tested the above patch with this one in
userspace that I'll send once this is accepted, togother with the rest
of connection tracking offload patches.
I also have a test for it, if anyone wants it.
Patch is:
lib/netdev-offloads-tc: Probe recirc tc sharing fea
Regarding the user_features change, I tested the above patch with this one in
userspace that I'll send once this is accepted, togother with the rest
of connection tracking offload patches.
I also have a test for it, if anyone wants it.
Patch is:
lib/netdev-offloads-tc: Probe recirc tc sharing fea
