On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:29 AM Jonas Bonn wrote:
>
> Hi Pravin,
>
> On 13/12/2020 20:32, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 11:56 PM Jonas Bonn wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Pravin,
> >>
> >> I've been thinking a bit about this and find it more and more
> >> interesting. Could you post a b
Hi Pravin,
On 13/12/2020 20:32, Pravin Shelar wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 11:56 PM Jonas Bonn wrote:
Hi Pravin,
I've been thinking a bit about this and find it more and more
interesting. Could you post a bit of information about the ip-route
changes you'll make in order to support GTP LW
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 11:56 PM Jonas Bonn wrote:
>
> Hi Pravin,
>
> I've been thinking a bit about this and find it more and more
> interesting. Could you post a bit of information about the ip-route
> changes you'll make in order to support GTP LWT encapsulation? Could
> you provide an exampl
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 2:11 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:40:17 -0800 Pravin B Shelar wrote:
> > Following patch add support for flow based tunneling API
> > to send and recv GTP tunnel packet over tunnel metadata API.
> > This would allow this device integration with OVS or
Hi Pravin,
I've been thinking a bit about this and find it more and more
interesting. Could you post a bit of information about the ip-route
changes you'll make in order to support GTP LWT encapsulation? Could
you provide an example command line?
I understand the advantages here of couplin
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:40:17 -0800 Pravin B Shelar wrote:
> Following patch add support for flow based tunneling API
> to send and recv GTP tunnel packet over tunnel metadata API.
> This would allow this device integration with OVS or eBPF using
> flow based tunneling APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prav
