On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 16:02 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> No problem at all with incremental patches ;-)
>
> In our experiment, touching udp_memory_allocated is only a part of the
> the source of contention, with the biggest source of contention being
> the sk_rmem_alloc update - which happens o
On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 05:43 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 10:17 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> > Thank you for working on this.
> >
> > I just gave a very quick look (the WE has started, children are
> > screaming ;-), overall the implementation seems quite similar to our
> >
On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 10:17 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Thank you for working on this.
>
> I just gave a very quick look (the WE has started, children are
> screaming ;-), overall the implementation seems quite similar to our
> one.
>
> I like the additional argument to ip_cmsg_recv_offset() i
On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 10:50 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 10:16 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Nice !
> >
> > I was working on this as well and my implementation was somewhat
> > different.
>
> This is my WIP
>
> Note this can be split in two parts.
>
> 1) One adding struct
On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 10:16 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Nice !
>
> I was working on this as well and my implementation was somewhat
> different.
This is my WIP
Note this can be split in two parts.
1) One adding struct sock *sk param to ip_cmsg_recv_offset()
This was because I left skb->sk
Nice !
I was working on this as well and my implementation was somewhat
different.
I then stopped when I found the UDP checksum bug and was waiting for net
to be merged into net-next
(
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=10df8e6152c6c400a563a673e9956320bfce1871
