On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 10:55 -0700, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> > + /* Reset SACK state. A conforming SACK implementation will
> > +* do the same at a timeout based retransmit. When a connection
> > +* is in a sad state like this, we care only about integrity
> > +* of th
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:17:09 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> Over the years, TCP BDP has increased a lot, and is typically
> in the order of ~10 Mbytes with help of clever Congestion Control
> modules.
>
> In presence of packet losses, TCP stores incoming packets into an o
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> Over the years, TCP BDP has increased a lot, and is typically
> in the order of ~10 Mbytes with help of clever Congestion Control
> modules.
>
> In presence of packet losses, TCP stores incoming packets into an out of
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> Over the years, TCP BDP has increased a lot, and is typically
> in the order of ~10 Mbytes with help of clever Congestion Control
> modules.
>
> In presence of packet losses, TCP stores incoming packets into an out of
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> Over the years, TCP BDP has increased a lot, and is typically
> in the order of ~10 Mbytes with help of clever Congestion Control
> modules.
>
> In presence of packet losses, TCP stores incoming packets into an out of
>
