On Thursday 24 January 2008 6:47:55 am Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Are there any remaining questions/problems about this patch?
> If none, I want this patch applied to net-2.6.25 tree.
Hello,
Taking into consideration that there are no current in-tree users of
this patch and the only known user of thi
Hello.
Are there any remaining questions/problems about this patch?
If none, I want this patch applied to net-2.6.25 tree.
Regards.
---
This patch modifies security_socket_post_accept() and introduces
security_socket_post_recv_datagram() LSM hooks.
Currently, security_socket_post_ac
--- Tetsuo Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
>
> Currently, there is no way to directly map security context from incoming
> packet to user process. This is because the creator or owner of a socket is
> not always the receiver of an incoming packet. The userland process who
> receives the i
James Morris wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
This patch allows LSM modules filter incoming connections/datagrams
based on the process's security context who is attempting to pick up.
There are already hooks to filter incoming connections/datagrams
based on the socket's security
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> This patch allows LSM modules filter incoming connections/datagrams
> based on the process's security context who is attempting to pick up.
>
> There are already hooks to filter incoming connections/datagrams
> based on the socket's security context, but
