On 10/12/20 11:56 PM, Vasily Averin wrote:
Dear Yonghong Song,
thank you for reporting the problem.
As far as I understand the problem here is that pos is incremented in .start
function.
Yes.
I do not,like an idea to avoid increment in ipv6_route_seq_next()
however ipv6_route_seq_start c
Dear Yonghong Song,
thank you for reporting the problem.
As far as I understand the problem here is that pos is incremented in .start
function.
I do not,like an idea to avoid increment in ipv6_route_seq_next()
however ipv6_route_seq_start can provide fake argument instead.
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fi
