2016-10-24, 15:32:40 +0200, Tobias Brunner wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> @@ -440,12 +448,12 @@ static void macsec_fill_sectag(struct
> >> macsec_eth_header *h,
> >> const struct macsec_secy *secy, u32 pn)
> >> {
> >>const struct macsec_tx_sc *tx_sc = &secy->tx_sc;
> >> + b
> [snip]
>> @@ -440,12 +448,12 @@ static void macsec_fill_sectag(struct
>> macsec_eth_header *h,
>> const struct macsec_secy *secy, u32 pn)
>> {
>> const struct macsec_tx_sc *tx_sc = &secy->tx_sc;
>> +bool sci_present = send_sci(secy);
>
> You're already comp
2016-10-21, 13:11:37 +0200, Tobias Brunner wrote:
> Even if sending SCIs is explicitly disabled, the code that creates the
> Security Tag might still decide to add it (e.g. if multiple RX SCs are
> defined on the MACsec interface).
> But because the header length so far only depended on the configu