On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 14:50, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> On 7/21/20 4:48 AM, Tony Ambardar wrote:
> > The bpftool sources include code to walk file trees, but use multiple
> > frameworks to do so: nftw and fts. While nftw conforms to POSIX/SUSv3 and
> > is widely available, fts is not conformant a
On 7/21/20 4:48 AM, Tony Ambardar wrote:
The bpftool sources include code to walk file trees, but use multiple
frameworks to do so: nftw and fts. While nftw conforms to POSIX/SUSv3 and
is widely available, fts is not conformant and less common, especially on
non-glibc systems. The inconsistent fr
On 21/07/2020 03:48, Tony Ambardar wrote:
> The bpftool sources include code to walk file trees, but use multiple
> frameworks to do so: nftw and fts. While nftw conforms to POSIX/SUSv3 and
> is widely available, fts is not conformant and less common, especially on
> non-glibc systems. The inconsis
