David Beckett writes:
> On 04/06/18 17:33, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> +
>> +#define SAMPLE_SIZE 64ul
>> +
> The program currently cannot sample minimum sized packets, as the 4 Byte
> crc checksum isnt present in ctx,
> may be better to use 60ul sample size to allow for these packets to be
On 04/06/18 17:33, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
+
+#define SAMPLE_SIZE 64ul
+
The program currently cannot sample minimum sized packets, as the 4 Byte
crc checksum isnt present in ctx,
may be better to use 60ul sample size to allow for these packets to be
processed?
+ if (data + SAMPLE_
Daniel Borkmann writes:
> On 06/05/2018 12:32 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Jun 2018 18:33:56 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> + if (load_bpf_file(filename)) {
>>
>> Would you mind using libbpf instead of bpf_load.o? I converted some
>> samples in be5bca44aa6b ("samples: bpf
On 06/05/2018 12:32 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2018 18:33:56 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> +if (load_bpf_file(filename)) {
>
> Would you mind using libbpf instead of bpf_load.o? I converted some
> samples in be5bca44aa6b ("samples: bpf: convert some XDP samples from
On Mon, 04 Jun 2018 18:33:56 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> + if (load_bpf_file(filename)) {
Would you mind using libbpf instead of bpf_load.o? I converted some
samples in be5bca44aa6b ("samples: bpf: convert some XDP samples from
bpf_load to libbpf"), it's pretty straight forward. M