On 01/18/2018 11:40 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 1/18/18 2:30 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 18:59 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>> due to some JITs doing if (src_reg == 0) check in 64-bit mode
>>> for div/mod opreations mask upper 32-bits of src register
>>> before doin
On 1/18/18 2:30 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 18:59 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
due to some JITs doing if (src_reg == 0) check in 64-bit mode
for div/mod opreations mask upper 32-bits of src register
before doing the check
Is the plan to fix JIT, and if they can all be fi
On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 18:59 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> due to some JITs doing if (src_reg == 0) check in 64-bit mode
> for div/mod opreations mask upper 32-bits of src register
> before doing the check
>
Is the plan to fix JIT, and if they can all be fixed,
revert this patch ?
x86 patch
On 01/13/2018 03:59 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> due to some JITs doing if (src_reg == 0) check in 64-bit mode
> for div/mod opreations mask upper 32-bits of src register
> before doing the check
>
> Fixes: 622582786c9e ("net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT")
> Fixes: 7a12b5031c6b ("sparc64: Add
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:59:52PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> due to some JITs doing if (src_reg == 0) check in 64-bit mode
> for div/mod opreations mask upper 32-bits of src register
> before doing the check
>
> Fixes: 622582786c9e ("net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT")
> Fixes: 7a12b5031