On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:13:02PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:55:41PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:49:35PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > stacktool reports the following false positive warnings:
> > >
> > > stacktool: kernel/b
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:55:41PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:49:35PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > stacktool reports the following false positive warnings:
> >
> > stacktool: kernel/bpf/core.o: __bpf_prog_run()+0x5c: sibling call from
> > callable instruct
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:49:35PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> stacktool reports the following false positive warnings:
>
> stacktool: kernel/bpf/core.o: __bpf_prog_run()+0x5c: sibling call from
> callable instruction with changed frame pointer
> stacktool: kernel/bpf/core.o: __bpf_prog_ru
On 01/21/2016 11:49 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
stacktool reports the following false positive warnings:
stacktool: kernel/bpf/core.o: __bpf_prog_run()+0x5c: sibling call from
callable instruction with changed frame pointer
stacktool: kernel/bpf/core.o: __bpf_prog_run()+0x60: function has