On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 08:45 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Roland, I think at one time we were talking about changing the Core to
> > better handle this? Either with attributes/capabilities that the low
> > level driver can set, or by set these method ptrs to NULL and the core
> > should hand
> Roland, I think at one time we were talking about changing the Core to
> better handle this? Either with attributes/capabilities that the low
> level driver can set, or by set these method ptrs to NULL and the core
> should handle it in the wrapper function...
Yes, it would make sense to ch
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:07 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 16:49 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
>
> > +
> > +static struct ib_ah *iwch_ah_create(struct ib_pd *pd,
> > + struct ib_ah_attr *ah_attr)
> > +{
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
> > +}
>
>
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 16:49 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
> +
> +static struct ib_ah *iwch_ah_create(struct ib_pd *pd,
> + struct ib_ah_attr *ah_attr)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
> +}
-ENOSYS is just about ALWAYS a bug in that it's guaranteed to be the
wrong
