Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: remove dead code

2007-08-13 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: This patch removes some residual dead code left over from removing the "flip" receive mode. This patch doesn't change the generated output at all, since gcc already realized it was dead. This resolves the "regression" reported by Adrian. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhar

Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: remove dead code

2007-08-07 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Jeff Garzik wrote: > Yes. It's in my pending-for-2.6.24 folder, since it's not a bug fix. Great, thanks. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: remove dead code

2007-08-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Please send drivers/net/* through me and netdev... Sure. Did you pick this patch up? Yes. It's in my pending-for-2.6.24 folder, since it's not a bug fix. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in th

Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: remove dead code

2007-08-07 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Jeff Garzik wrote: > Please send drivers/net/* through me and netdev... Sure. Did you pick this patch up? Thanks, J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info

Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: remove dead code

2007-08-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: This patch removes some residual dead code left over from removing the "flip" receive mode. This patch doesn't change the generated output at all, since gcc already realized it was dead. This resolves the "regression" reported by Adrian. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhar