On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 13:59 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
> member[1][2],
> introduced in C99
On Sat, 9 May 2020 23:43:08 + Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > Saeed, I'm expecting you to take this and the mlx4 patch via your
> > trees.
>
> Yes for the mlx5 patch, but usually Dave takes mlx4 patches directly.
Ack, it said IB on it, but looks like the patch can as well be applied
to net-next,
On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 13:59 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
> member[1][2],
> introduced in C99
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 16:36 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2020 13:59:35 -0500 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to
> > declare
> > variable-length types such a
On Thu, 7 May 2020 13:59:35 -0500 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
>
