Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> By the way, Patrick, this looks like nlk->pid == 0 if and only if this
>> is a kernel socket. Right?
>>
>
> Thats correct.
>
>> I have told with Alexey Kuznetsov and we have discrovered a way to get
>> rid of
>> skb_que
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
By the way, Patrick, this looks like nlk->pid == 0 if and only if this
is a kernel socket. Right?
Thats correct.
I have told with Alexey Kuznetsov and we have discrovered a way to get
rid of
skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
sk->sk_data_ready
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> netlink_kernel_create can be called with NULL as an input callback in several
>> places, f.e. in kobject_uevent_init. This means that if one sends packet from
>> user to kernel for such a socket, the packet will be leaked in the socket
>> queue fore
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> netlink_kernel_create can be called with NULL as an input callback in several
> places, f.e. in kobject_uevent_init. This means that if one sends packet from
> user to kernel for such a socket, the packet will be leaked in the socket
> queue forever.
>
> This patch adds a s
