Re: [PATCH] ethtool: Add QSFP-DD support

2020-08-06 Thread Adrian Pop
> > Branch "next" is merged into master now so you can base v2 on master. > Hi Michal! Just submitted v2. I fixed the little problems noticed by Ido and you. The submission consists of only one patch, since I noticed that some extra whitespace 'fixes' were wrongly introduced by my editor so I sup

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: Add QSFP-DD support

2020-08-04 Thread Michal Kubecek
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Adrian Pop wrote: > > > > AFAICS the kernel counterpart is going to reach mainline in 5.9-rc1 > > merge window. Please base your patch on "next" branch or wait until next > > is merged into master after 5.8 release (which should be later today or > > tomorr

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: Add QSFP-DD support

2020-08-04 Thread Michal Kubecek
I noticed one more minor problem: On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:47:25AM +0300, Adrian Pop wrote: > +static void qsfp_dd_show_sig_optical_pwr(const __u8 *id, __u32 eeprom_len) > +{ > + static const char * const aw_strings[] = { > + "%s power high alarm (Channel %d)", > +

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: Add QSFP-DD support

2020-08-04 Thread Adrian Pop
> > AFAICS the kernel counterpart is going to reach mainline in 5.9-rc1 > merge window. Please base your patch on "next" branch or wait until next > is merged into master after 5.8 release (which should be later today or > tomorrow). I will wait until tomorrow and rebase my patch onto master then.

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: Add QSFP-DD support

2020-08-04 Thread Michal Kubecek
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:47:25AM +0300, Adrian Pop wrote: > The Common Management Interface Specification (CMIS) for QSFP-DD shares > some similarities with other form factors such as QSFP or SFP, but due to > the fact that the module memory map is different, the current ethtool > version is not

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: Add QSFP-DD support

2020-08-04 Thread Adrian Pop
Hi Andrew, Ido! > Hi Adrian, thanks again for submitting this patch. I got two comments > off-list. Sharing them here. Thanks for pointing that out, I took a look and you're right. I'll fix them. > Didn't we discuss that page 3 might be useful? I would prefer not to > document that pages 0x10 an

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: Add QSFP-DD support

2020-08-04 Thread Ido Schimmel
Hi Adrian, thanks again for submitting this patch. I got two comments off-list. Sharing them here. On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:47:25AM +0300, Adrian Pop wrote: > +/** > + * Print the cable assembly length, for both passive copper and active > + * optical or electrical cables. The base length (bits

Re: [PATCH] ethtool: Add QSFP-DD support

2020-08-02 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:47:25AM +0300, Adrian Pop wrote: > The Common Management Interface Specification (CMIS) for QSFP-DD shares > some similarities with other form factors such as QSFP or SFP, but due to > the fact that the module memory map is different, the current ethtool > version is not