David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:46:24 -0500
David Miller wrote:
[Patch 1/7] [SUBSYSTEM]: Foo bar baz...
The most popular tool is git-am, which I and many others use.
git-am will snip "[SUBSYSTEM]" in the example that you give.
It should o
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:29:15 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:37:17 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:48:35 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:55:48 -0800
> Kinda funny. I (and I bet lots of others) spend a lot of time
> fixing, cleaning up and totally rewriting patch titles.
It's probably the majority of the typing I perform to apply a patch
except for the folks who for
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:46:24 -0500
> David Miller wrote:
> > [Patch 1/7] [SUBSYSTEM]: Foo bar baz...
>
> The most popular tool is git-am, which I and many others use.
>
> git-am will snip "[SUBSYSTEM]" in the example that you give.
It should only snip th
MAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:48:35 -0800
> >>>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: assign random address
> >>> "bridge&
David Miller wrote:
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:29:15 -0800
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:37:17 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:48:35 -0800
Subject:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:40:18 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:34:42 -0800
>
> > Take a look at the git logs, see what most other people are doing.
>
> You're talking bucking a convention that has been used
>
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:34:42 -0800
> Take a look at the git logs, see what most other people are doing.
You're talking bucking a convention that has been used
for all networking changes since we starting using real
revision control.
I've shown how the s
; > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:48:35 -0800
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: assign random address
> > >
> > > "bridge" should all-caps and in brackets,
> >
> > No, &q
ote:
> >
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:48:35 -0800
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: assign random address
> > >
> > > "bridge" should all-caps and in brackets,
>
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:29:15 -0800
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:37:17 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:48:35 -0800
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:37:17 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:48:35 -0800
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: assign random address
>
> "bridge" should all-cap
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:48:35 -0800
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: assign random address
"bridge" should all-caps and in brackets, "assign random address"
should be capitalized like a proper english sentence with a
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:48:35 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assigning a valid random address to bridge device solves problems
> when bridge device is brought up before adding real device to bridge.
> When the first real device is added to the bridge, it's address
> will overi
14 matches
Mail list logo
