Hi Maciej,
On Tue Aug 18, 2020 at 2:19 PM PDT, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 2:11 PM Daniel Xu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon Jul 27, 2020 at 10:01 PM PDT, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:35 PM wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Ashkan Nikravesh
> > > >
> > > > Th
On Mon Jul 27, 2020 at 10:01 PM PDT, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:35 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Ashkan Nikravesh
> >
> > The existing bpf helper functions to get timestamp return the time
> > elapsed since system boot. This timestamp is not particularly useful
> > where epoch t
On 7/28/20 11:15 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:57 PM David Ahern wrote:
>>
>> On 7/28/20 12:28 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>> In some, yes, which also means that in some other they can't. So I'm
>>> still worried about misuses of REALCLOCK, within (internal daemons
>>> wit
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:57 PM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 7/28/20 12:28 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > In some, yes, which also means that in some other they can't. So I'm
> > still worried about misuses of REALCLOCK, within (internal daemons
> > within the company) our outside (BCC tools and alik
Starovoitov ; Daniel Borkmann ;
> Martin Lau ; Nikravesh, Ashkan
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Add bpf_ktime_get_real_ns
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:57 AM Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:01 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> > wrote:
> >>
&g
On 7/28/20 12:28 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> In some, yes, which also means that in some other they can't. So I'm
> still worried about misuses of REALCLOCK, within (internal daemons
> within the company) our outside (BCC tools and alike) of data centers.
> Especially if people will start using it
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:57 AM Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:01 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:35 PM wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Ashkan Nikravesh
>> >
>> > The existing bpf helper functions to get timestamp return the time
>> > elapsed sinc
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:35 PM wrote:
>
> From: Ashkan Nikravesh
>
> The existing bpf helper functions to get timestamp return the time
> elapsed since system boot. This timestamp is not particularly useful
> where epoch timestamp is required or more than one server is involved
> and time sync i
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:35 PM wrote:
>
> From: Ashkan Nikravesh
>
> The existing bpf helper functions to get timestamp return the time
> elapsed since system boot. This timestamp is not particularly useful
> where epoch timestamp is required or more than one server is involved
> and time sync i
