Thank you for the clarification.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:07 AM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 2/22/21 1:37 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/22/21 4:15 AM, Yejune Deng wrote:
> >> The arp_hh_ops structure is similar to the arp_generic_ops structure.
> >> but the latter is more general,so rem
On 2/22/21 1:37 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 2/22/21 4:15 AM, Yejune Deng wrote:
>> The arp_hh_ops structure is similar to the arp_generic_ops structure.
>> but the latter is more general,so remove the arp_hh_ops structure.
>>
>> Fix when took out the neigh->ops assignment:
>> 8.973653] #PF:
On 2/22/21 4:15 AM, Yejune Deng wrote:
> The arp_hh_ops structure is similar to the arp_generic_ops structure.
> but the latter is more general,so remove the arp_hh_ops structure.
>
> Fix when took out the neigh->ops assignment:
> 8.973653] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [8.97
Sorry,it was my fault, I will resubmit.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 9:54 AM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 2/19/21 9:32 PM, Yejune Deng wrote:
> > static const struct neigh_ops arp_direct_ops = {
> > .family = AF_INET,
> > .output = neigh_direct_output,
> > @@ -277
On 2/19/21 9:32 PM, Yejune Deng wrote:
> static const struct neigh_ops arp_direct_ops = {
> .family = AF_INET,
> .output = neigh_direct_output,
> @@ -277,15 +269,10 @@ static int arp_constructor(struct neighbour *neigh)
> memcpy(neigh->
