From: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:57:23 +0300
> No. I remove _two_ pointers unused_next and unused_prevp, and add
> the list_head, which is _two_ pointers as well. I've even checked the
> compilation on both i386 and x86_64 - the sizeof(struct inet_peer)
> is not
David Miller wrote:
> From: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:32:58 +0300
>
>> The inetpeer.c tracks the LRU list of inet_perr-s, but makes
>> it by hands. Use the list_head-s for this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This makes every ine
From: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:32:58 +0300
> The inetpeer.c tracks the LRU list of inet_perr-s, but makes
> it by hands. Use the list_head-s for this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This makes every inetpeer struct consume 8 more bytes
