Re: [PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-12-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: Following patch is clearly 2.6.25 material and is needed to get SGI IP28 machines supported. Thomas. SGI IP28 machines would need special treatment (enable adding addtional wait states) when accessing memory uncached. To avoid this pain I changed the driver to use onl

Re: [PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-11-27 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 01:29:19PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > Following patch is clearly 2.6.25 material and is needed to get SGI IP28 > machines supported. > > Thomas. > > SGI IP28 machines would need special treatment (enable adding addtional > wait states) when accessing memory uncac