Re: [PATCH] Age Entry For IPv4 Route Table

2007-06-25 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530 Varun Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an > age entry for all the routes in the routing table. The entry in the RFC is > inetCidrRouteAge and oid is inetCidrRouteAge.1.10. > Many s

Re: [PATCH] Age Entry For IPv4 Route Table

2007-06-25 Thread David Miller
From: Varun Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:28:37 +0530 > Ok i understand. But can you suggest anyother way to do the above? Just because I found a fault in your patch doesn't mean that it becomes my job isn't to implement the feature for you. - To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH] Age Entry For IPv4 Route Table

2007-06-25 Thread Varun Chandramohan
David Miller wrote: > From: Varun Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:51:39 +0530 > > >> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / wrote: >> >>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530), Varun >>> Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH] Age Entry For IPv4 Route Table

2007-06-24 Thread Varun Chandramohan
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530), Varun > Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > > >> According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an >> age entry for all the routes in the routing table. The entr

Re: [PATCH] Age Entry For IPv4 Route Table

2007-06-24 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530), Varun Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an > age entry for all the routes in the routing table. The entry in the RFC is > inetCidrRouteAge and oid