David Miller a écrit :
From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:32:22 +0200
OK then. Even on a distro kernel (allyesconfig), size(flow) would
shrink by 20 bytes.
For the time being, why don't we just kill off the unused dnports
bits entirely.
Once the support code to
From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:32:22 +0200
> OK then. Even on a distro kernel (allyesconfig), size(flow) would
> shrink by 20 bytes.
For the time being, why don't we just kill off the unused dnports
bits entirely.
Once the support code to use those bits is writt
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 14:42, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Its not used at the moment[*], but would be required for any kind of
> > > flow tracking. The objnum field, could be folded into the objname field
> > > I guess on the basis that objnamel == 0 means objname[0] represents the
Hi,
> >
> > Its not used at the moment[*], but would be required for any kind of flow
> > tracking. The objnum field, could be folded into the objname field I
> > guess on the basis that objnamel == 0 means objname[0] represents the
> > objnum, but that doesn't really buy much.
>
> Well, as I pri
Hi David,
David Miller schrieb:
> I don't like these kinds of patches because %99 of people will never
> ever realize the "savings" because distribution vendors will always,
> unlaterally, enable everything.
People producing Linux Appliances DO compile their own kernels.
And some distribution ve
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 10:20, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:53:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:42:17 +0200
> >
> > > How many people are using DECNET and want to pay the price of this
> >
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:53:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:42:17 +0200
>
> > How many people are using DECNET and want to pay the price of this
> > 20 bytes dnports structure ?
>
Point taken :-) Eric, you also need to ad
From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:42:17 +0200
> How many people are using DECNET and want to pay the price of this
> 20 bytes dnports structure ?
I bet you could make that cost get hidden by careful rearrangement
of the struct flow, or adjustment of the implementati
David Miller a écrit :
From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:08:07 +0200
Each route entry includes a 'struct flow'. This structure has a
current size of 80 bytes. This patch makes a size reduction
depending on
CONFIG_IPV6/CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE/CONFIG_DECNET/CONFIG_IP_ROU
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / a écrit :
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:08:07 +0200), Eric Dumazet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
+#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
struct {
struct in6_addr dadd
From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:08:07 +0200
> Each route entry includes a 'struct flow'. This structure has a
> current size of 80 bytes. This patch makes a size reduction
> depending on
> CONFIG_IPV6/CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE/CONFIG_DECNET/CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK
> For a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:08:07 +0200), Eric
Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
> struct {
> struct in6_addr daddr;
> struct in
12 matches
Mail list logo
