Re: [Bug 6688] Memory allocation problem

2006-07-12 Thread David Miller
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:45:13 +1000 > [IPV4]: Fix error handling for fib_insert_node call > > The error handling around fib_insert_node was broken because we always > zeroed the error before checking it. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ap

Re: [Bug 6688] Memory allocation problem

2006-07-12 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:44:46PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > [IPV4]: Fix error handling for fib_insert_node call Doh, fogot the patch. [IPV4]: Fix error handling for fib_insert_node call The error handling around fib_insert_node was broken because we always zeroed the error before checking i

Re: [Bug 6688] Memory allocation problem

2006-07-12 Thread Herbert Xu
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:46:08 -0700 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6688 > > This is looking like a net memory leak in 2.6.16. 1/3rd is in ip_fib_alias > and 2/3rds is in size-64. I've asked the reporter to app

Re: [Bug 6688] Memory allocation problem

2006-06-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:46:08 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6688 This is looking like a net memory leak in 2.6.16. 1/3rd is in ip_fib_alias and 2/3rds is in size-64. I've asked the reporter to apply the leak detector patch so we can find out who is u