On Sat, 2006-03-25 20:47:39 +0100, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:46:31PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense.
> >
> > There is likely more code to support a modular unix.ko, this has to
El Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:13:08 -0800,
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Why? You can build unix domain sockets as a loadable module and
> it runs fine (or it did last I tried). Whether that makes sense from a
I've been running with CONFIG_UNIX=m since the dawn of time and everythin
On Sat, Feb 25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense.
There is likely more code to support a modular unix.ko, this has to go
as well.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at ht
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 09:13 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> Why? You can build unix domain sockets as a loadable module and
> it runs fine (or it did last I tr
Adrian Bunk wrote:
CONFIG_UNIX=m doesn't make much sense.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why? You can build unix domain sockets as a loadable module and
it runs fine (or it did last I tried). Whether that makes sense from a
distribution point of
view, because everybody w
