Re: RFC: new WIP version of au1000_eth.c phylib conversion (was Re: RFC: au1000_etc.c phylib rewrite)

2006-05-08 Thread Andy Fleming
On May 4, 2006, at 04:17, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: Hello, I've tried to adapt the PHY detection code to allow for dynamic runtime configuration (with fallback to search for the 2nd MAC PHY on the 1st MAC's MII bus), as well as selectable static PHY configuration through Kconfig (e.g. f

Re: RFC: au1000_etc.c phylib rewrite

2006-05-04 Thread Andy Fleming
On May 3, 2006, at 11:34, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: hello * On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 11:20 -0500, Mark Schank wrote: At 08:23 AM 5/2/06 +0200, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 15:09 -0500, Mark Schank wrote: The Cogent CSB655 used the Broadcom Dual Phy. They eventually

Re: RFC: au1000_etc.c phylib rewrite

2006-05-03 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > while at it, does anyone happen to know what the phy-addr/MAC assignment > on the XXS1500 is? Nope. > but one thing that seems strange to me; CONFIG_BCM5222_DUAL_PHY doesn't > seem to be defined anywhere; shouldn't that be a

Re: RFC: au1000_etc.c phylib rewrite

2006-05-03 Thread Herbert Valerio Riedel
hello * On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 11:20 -0500, Mark Schank wrote: > At 08:23 AM 5/2/06 +0200, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > >On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 15:09 -0500, Mark Schank wrote: > > > The Cogent CSB655 used the Broadcom Dual Phy. They eventually redesigned > > > the board and switched to two singl