On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 06:27:27PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 09:21:37 +0200
>
> > here is a resend of my series to lift the copy_from_user out of the
> > individual sctp sockopt handlers into the main sctp_setsockopt
> > routine.
> >
> > Change
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 09:21:37 +0200
> here is a resend of my series to lift the copy_from_user out of the
> individual sctp sockopt handlers into the main sctp_setsockopt
> routine.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - fixes a few sizeof calls.
> - use memzero_explicit in sctp_s
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 09:19:29AM +0200, 'Christoph Hellwig' wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:36:23AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
...
> > What if you two work on a joint patchset for this? The proposals are
> > quite close. The differences around the setsockopt handling are
> > minima
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 07:37:49PM +, David Laight wrote:
> I'm going to post a V3 of my big patch - I spotted an error.
> I'll include a different (smaller) patch in 0/1 that generates
> exactly the same object code but is easier to review.
Please make sure to split at least setsockopt and ge
From: 'Christoph Hellwig'
> Sent: 23 May 2020 08:19
...
> Alternatively I'll also happily only do a partial conversion for what
> I need for the kernel_setsockopt removal and let you and Dave decided
> what you guys prefer for the rest.
I presume the justification for removing kernel_[sg]etsockopt
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:36:23AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> It's subjective, yes, but we hardly have patches over 5k lines.
> In the case here, as changing the functions also requires changing
> their call later on the file, it helps to be able to check that is was
> properly updated
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 19:46:35 +0200
> based on the review of Davids patch to do something similar I dusted off
> the series I had started a few days ago to move the memdup_user or
> copy_from_user from the inidividual sockopts into sctp_setsockopt,
> which is done with o
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> Sent: 22 May 2020 15:36
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 08:02:09AM +, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Christoph Hellwig
> > > Sent: 21 May 2020 18:47
> > > based on the review of Davids patch to do something similar I dusted off
> > > the series I had started a few da
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 08:02:09AM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig
> > Sent: 21 May 2020 18:47
> > based on the review of Davids patch to do something similar I dusted off
> > the series I had started a few days ago to move the memdup_user or
> > copy_from_user from the inidivi
From: Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: 21 May 2020 18:47
> based on the review of Davids patch to do something similar I dusted off
> the series I had started a few days ago to move the memdup_user or
> copy_from_user from the inidividual sockopts into sctp_setsockopt,
> which is done with one patch per o
10 matches
Mail list logo
