From: Karstens, Nate
> Sent: 01 May 2020 15:45
> Thanks for the suggestion. I looked into it and noticed that
> do_close_on_exec() appears to have some
> optimizations as well:
>
> > set = fdt->close_on_exec[i];
> > if (!set)
> > continue;
>
> If we interleave the close-on-exec and close-on-
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 02:45:16PM +, Karstens, Nate wrote:
> Others -- I will respond to feedback outside of implementation details in a
> separate message.
FWIW, I'm opposed to the entire feature. Improving the implementation
will not change that.
; Helge Deller ; David S.
Miller ; Jakub Kicinski ;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-al...@vger.kernel.org; linux-par...@vger.kernel.org;
sparcli...@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Changli Gao
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] f
