Re: Pull request for bonding-sysfs branch of netdev-jwl

2005-11-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
John W. Linville wrote: Jeff, These are the sysfs changes for the bonding driver. I put them in a separate branch for a couple of reasons. For one, I had to massage a few of the patches, and some of them had fuzz. So, it would be good for Mitch and/or Jay to double-check the merge. Also, I t

Re: [Bonding-devel] Pull request for bonding-sysfs branch of netdev-jwl

2005-11-14 Thread Radheka Godse
Mitch is several thousand miles away and may not get a chance to ACK to this in time. This patch looks fine. It functions properly. We have started testing with it and no problems have been reported so far. I would request that it be applied upstream, we have lost this window many a times be

RE: Pull request for bonding-sysfs branch of netdev-jwl

2005-11-14 Thread Williams, Mitch A
Unfortunately, I am currently several thousand miles away from my Linux boxes, so I can't apply and test the patch. A quick eyeball of the patch looks OK, though. -Mitch >-Original Message- >From: John W. Linville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >These are the sysfs changes for the bonding

Pull request for bonding-sysfs branch of netdev-jwl

2005-11-13 Thread John W. Linville
Jeff, These are the sysfs changes for the bonding driver. I put them in a separate branch for a couple of reasons. For one, I had to massage a few of the patches, and some of them had fuzz. So, it would be good for Mitch and/or Jay to double-check the merge. Also, I thought this might be a lit