On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:08:16PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> But still some 'quirks' are possible there: removing and adding
> devices 'properly' would often require resetting of many subclasses,
...Hmm, probably they are always removed from/with the children, then no
problem! (I know, I
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:31:22PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
...
> No, this seems fine, thanks. Even better would be a way to get
> the last lockdep subclass through lockdep somehow, but I couldn't
> find a clean way for this. So I've applied your patch and also
> fixed macvlan.
As a matter of
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
As a matter of fact I started to doubt it's a real problem: 2 vlan
headers in the row - is it working?
Yes, apparently some people are using this.
Anyway, as Patrick pointed, the previous patch was a bit buggy, and
deeper nesting needs a little more (if it's can work to
Benny Amorsen wrote, On 01/02/2008 05:40 PM:
...
> The box that shows the problem is "almost-production", so it doesn't
> have a build system. Is there a chance you could get the patch into
> Rawhide or some other testing repository? It takes forever and a lot
> of disk space to rebuild a kernel RP
Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Subject: [PATCH] nested VLAN: fix lockdep's recursive locking warning
>
> Allow vlans nesting other vlans without lockdep's warnings (max. 8 levels).
>
> Reported-by: Benny Amorsen
> Tested-by: Benny Amorsen (?) NEEDS TESTING!
>
> Signed-off-by: J
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 04:04:17PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
...
> > That will increment the subclass globally, but it should actually just
> > use real_dev->subclass + 1. [...]
...
> to two subclasses - any nested vlan gets sec
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Patric, [...]
OOPS... Sorry Patrick!
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 04:04:17PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>> diff -Nurp linux-2.6.24-rc5-/net/8021q/vlan.c
>> linux-2.6.24-rc5+/net/8021q/vlan.c
>> --- linux-2.6.24-rc5-/net/8021q/vlan.c 2007-12-17 13:29:19.0
>> +0100
>> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc5+/net/8021
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.24-rc5-/net/8021q/vlan.c linux-2.6.24-rc5+/net/8021q/vlan.c
--- linux-2.6.24-rc5-/net/8021q/vlan.c 2007-12-17 13:29:19.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc5+/net/8021q/vlan.c 2007-12-20 14:21:02.0 +0100
@@ -307,12 +307,15 @@ int unregister_vlan
On 19-12-2007 00:03, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> From:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426164
>
>
> kernel version is 2.6.24-0.107.rc5.git3.fc9
>
> From boot log on serial console:
> (full log attached)
>
> Added VLAN with VID == 2 to IF -:eth0.1568:-
>
> ==
From:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426164
kernel version is 2.6.24-0.107.rc5.git3.fc9
>From boot log on serial console:
(full log attached)
Added VLAN with VID == 2 to IF -:eth0.1568:-
=
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.
11 matches
Mail list logo
