On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:46:03AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steffen Klassert
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:35:16 +0200
>
> > We currently check if a socket is attached to a skb and do socket
> > error notification in this case, otherwise we do PMTU discovery if
> > the packet is too big.
From: Steffen Klassert
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:35:16 +0200
> We currently check if a socket is attached to a skb and do socket
> error notification in this case, otherwise we do PMTU discovery if
> the packet is too big. Looks like this socket check is not sufficient
> if the packet is already
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 05:25:24PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steffen Klassert
> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 08:32:23 +0200
>
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:32:15AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> On 05/19/2015 12:57 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >> >The MTU should be 1500. All the IPsec ov
From: Steffen Klassert
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 08:32:23 +0200
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:32:15AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On 05/19/2015 12:57 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>> >The MTU should be 1500. All the IPsec overhead is handled by PMTU
>> >discovery, just like in the case we use IPse
On 05/19/2015 11:32 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:32:15AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 05/19/2015 12:57 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
The MTU should be 1500. All the IPsec overhead is handled by PMTU
discovery, just like in the case we use IPsec without vti tunnels.
T
