On Tuesday 05 February 2008 09:56, Kostya B wrote:
>
> 1. Let's assume a driver which has a HW csum capability, however it has a
> privilege to assign any value for ip_summed.
> For example the driver assigns "unnecessary" for most of the packets, however
> it fails to verify the packets less th
;out" label of
__lro_proc_skb()) The comment says "Original SKB has to be posted to stack". I
would be wrong, but I don't get the reason to possible change of ip_summed.
Regards,
- Kostya
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL P
On Sunday 03 February 2008 10:48, Kostya B wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The mail is related to the way LRO manipulates the ip_summed value. Could
> anybody (author) explain why to overwrite the original value of
> skb->ip_summed, when it's processing by __lro_proc_skb ?
> E.g. in out: label
>
> Why not
Hi,
The mail is related to the way LRO manipulates the ip_summed value. Could
anybody (author) explain why to overwrite the original value of skb->ip_summed,
when it's processing by __lro_proc_skb ?
E.g. in out: label
Why not to preserve the coherency of csum status of each incoming to LRO
pa
