On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:21:06PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 03:35:26PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > I see where the bug came from. Indeed IPv6 does do fragmentation
> > but only for tunnel mode. While your patch added a check that also
> > affected transport mode.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 03:35:26PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> I see where the bug came from. Indeed IPv6 does do fragmentation
> but only for tunnel mode. While your patch added a check that also
> affected transport mode. So in addition to the GSO fix we should
> also make the MTU check cond
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 09:19:16AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>
> As far as I remember, this was to catch local message size
> errors before __xfrm6_output calls ip6_fragment which would
> use icmpv6_send for the error notification. IPv4 does not do
> fragmentation in the xfrm4_output functions
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 04:24:32PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Hi Steffen:
>
> I received a bug report regarding poor IPComp performance over
> IPv6:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257952
>
> It appears to have been caused by
>
> commit dd767856a36e00b631d65ebc4bb81b19915
Hi Steffen:
I received a bug report regarding poor IPComp performance over
IPv6:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257952
It appears to have been caused by
commit dd767856a36e00b631d65ebc4bb81b19915532d6
Author: Steffen Klassert
Date: Tue Oct 11 01:44:30 2011 +
xf
