On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:12:58PM -0400, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 21 Jul 2005 21:44:43 +0100), Andrew
> McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > I guess the fix would be a matter of changing:
> >
> > if (sk && ra->sel == sel) {
> >
> > to
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 21 Jul 2005 21:44:43 +0100), Andrew
McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> I guess the fix would be a matter of changing:
>
> if (sk && ra->sel == sel) {
>
> to:
>
> if (sk && ra->sel == sel &&
> (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if ||
> sk->sk_bound_dev_if == s
Hi,
I've noticed a difference between the IPv4 and IPv6 router alert
handling, which I think constitutes a bug.
For IPv4, you can bind a socket to an interface. If you use the
IP_ROUTER_ALERT sockopt then packets with router alert options are only
delivered to raw sockets bound to the incoming in
