From: KOVACS Krisztian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:36:18 +0100
> Neither of these require IP_FREEBIND as core functionality, and will
> probably work if IP_FREEBIND would be bound to CAP_NET_ADMIN.
>
> So the question is: shall we take the IP_FREEBIND approach, this would
> cha
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 07:47, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
> > ip_route_output() contains a check to make sure that no flows with
> > non-local source IP addresses are routed. Unfortunately this check
> > makes it completely impossible to use non-local bound sockets as no
